William Bock, III, Partner

Bill Bock is an experienced litigator with substantial sports law and Title IX experience and background in international law enforcement anti-doping and drug trafficking investigations. Bill was the General Counsel of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) during 2007-2020 where he worked closely with U.S. law enforcement agencies, including the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and international law enforcement and anti-doping officials.

Bill has represented clients in high-profile investigations, litigation and arbitration throughout the United States and globally. He has represented athletes, sports organizations, Fortune 500 companies, governmental agencies and those impacted by governmental or organizational overreach.

Bill has a strong interest in business and sports ethics, sports drug testing, athletic eligibility issues and protecting the rights of female athletes to fair competition and safe spaces in women’s sports, as well as constitutional and human rights, the separation of powers and how the law protects individual liberty and a free society.

Bill has filed amicus briefs in cases involving Title IX and/or women’s rights in sport before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Second, Fourth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals and has handled cases as lead counsel in state and federal court seeking to protect the women’s category of sport. Recently, Bill filed a lawsuit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and Georgia Tech University in which he represents eighteen current and former female student-athletes challenging the NCAA’s and Georgia Tech’s failure to protect women’s rights in Riley Gaines, et al. v. NCAA, et al.

Bill has appeared before panels of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and/or the International Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, in more than seventy-five (75+) sports eligibility disputes. The CAS is the specialized arbitral tribunal which handles international sport disputes.

Bill has extensive experience in state and federal trial and appellate courts where he has handled business, commercial, constitutional, regulatory, election law and sports law cases. He is interested in personal liberty issues arising from governmental overreach and overbroad or discriminatory Covid-19 restrictions.

Bill has extensive experience with athlete eligibility matters arising under specialized rules and statutes such as the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act (the “Sports Act”). Bill was involved in one of the early arbitrations under the Sports Act in 1994 and has served as legal counsel in numerous arbitrations under the Sports Act since that time.

Bill’s law practice is international in scope as he has represented clients throughout the world and appeared before courts or tribunals throughout the world and appeared before courts or tribunals in more than a dozen States and in the United Kingdom and Switzerland.

Bill was the lead attorney for the USADA in the investigation of the use of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and other members of the United States Postal Service Cycling Team. Bill interviewed each of USADA’s cyclist witnesses, represented USADA in federal court proceedings brought by Armstrong in Austin, Texas, in which Bill established that USADA could asset jurisdiction over Armstrong and sanction him for anti-doping rule violations. See Armstrong v. Tygart, 886 F.Supp.2d 572 (W.D.Tex. 2012). Bill was the principal author of USADA’s approximately 200-page Reasoned Decision setting forth the evidence against Mr. Armstrong. For his work on the Armstrong case Bill was named a 2012 Lawyer of the Year by Law Week Colorado and a Distinguished Barrister by the Indiana Lawyer in 2013.

Bill’s work on the Armstrong case is described in the New York Times bestseller list books: Wheelmen: Lance Armstrong, the Tour de France, and the Greatest Sports Conspiracy Ever by Wall Street Journal reporters Reed Albergotti and Vanessa O’Connell and Cycle of Lies: The Fall of Lance Armstrong by New York Times sports reporter Juliet Macur as well as in news articles, including “Armstrong’s Wall of Silence Fell Rider by Rider,” New York Times, October 20, 2012;“Local lawyer key figure in felling Armstrong,” Indianapolis Business Journal, October 27, 2012; and “No big bad wolf behind Lance Armstrong investigation,” Indianapolis Business Journal, October 31, 2012.

More recently, Bill was the lead attorney for USADA in the cases of USADA v. Salazar and USADA v. Brown, in which USADA established anti-doping rule violations by the coach and physician for the Nike Oregon Project, a distance running training group which was housed on the campus of Nike, Inc. in Beaverton, Oregon. The arbitration awards reference the tenacity of the defense mounted by Nike in lengthy hearings in these cases which were publicly announced on September 30, 2019.

For nearly 14 years, Bill served as General Counsel to USADA located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. USADA is the independent entity charged with the responsibility to investigate and prosecute instances of drug use in Olympic and Paralympic sports by U.S. athletes, (www.usada.org), and Bill had direct responsibility for USADA’s investigations and prosecutions. Bill was also heavily involved in USADA’s investigation of the BALCO doping conspiracy and was interviewed for and quoted in the best-selling book, Game of Shadows: Barry Bonds, BALCO, and the Steroids Scandal that Rocked Professional Sports by San Francisco Chronicle Reporters Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams (Gotham Books, 2006). Prior to becoming USADA’s General Counsel, Bock had served USADA as outside counsel for seven years.

In 2009 Bill was appointed by the international swimming federation, the Federation Internationale de Natation (FINA) headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, (www.fina.org), to serve as one of six (6) international arbitrators on the FINA Doping Panel which adjudicates sports doping matters involving international swimmers. Bill served in this capacity through the end of 2021.

In 2021 Bill was appointed to serve as a member of the World Aquatics Integrity Unit Anti-Doping Advisory Body on which he began to serve in 2022 as one of six independent members charged with monitoring anti-doping practices by the international federation for aquatics sports (i.e., swimming, diving, water polo and artistic swimming).

During 2016-2024, Bill served as a public member of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I Committee on Infractions. In this capacity, Bill heard cases involving the potential violation of NCAA rules. Bill resigned from the NCAA Committee in February 2024 in protest over the NCAA’s failure to adequately protect female athletes.

During 2004 through 2006, Bill served as Parliamentarian of the Indiana House of Representatives in which he advised the Speaker of the House on legal and parliamentary issues. As Parliamentarian, Bill also provided oversight on legal matters involving the House, including litigation brought concerning Indiana’s photo identification law for voters and a challenge to the practice of legislative prayers.

Bill has been called upon by sports organizations including the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) and World Triathlon to provide advice regarding the protection of women’s rights to a level playing field and fair and safe competition. He has been an invited speaker by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) at WADA’s Annual Anti-Doping Organization Symposium, by USADA (on multiple occasions) at USADA’s Annual Symposium on Anti-Doping Science, by Play the Game (international sport integrity organization), Sport Resolutions (international sport arbitration body) the French Olympic Committee, the U.S. Olympic Committee (on multiple occasions), the Brazilian Anti-Doping Agency, the Norwegian Anti-Doping Agency,  the Netherlands Anti-Doping Authority and at numerous other international and domestic conferences on sports integrity, anti-doping and the protection of women’s rights. Bill has also been a member of the U.S. delegation at multiple World Conferences on Doping in Sport.

Bill also practices in the areas of government defense, constitutional law, education law, voting rights and election law. He has defended and advised entities of local government in Voting Rights Act, political firing and constitutional and redistricting cases and has represented clients in recounts, election contests, and election boundary disputes before the Indiana Election Commission and Indiana Recount Commission. He has handled matters involving compliance of voting systems with state and federal law and has represented counties in negotiations with their election services vendors. He has also served as special redistricting counsel to the Indiana House Republican Caucuses in 2000 and 2010, to the Indianapolis City-County Council in 2002 and to other units of government.

Bill has handled a half dozen recounts and/or election contests involving the election of state legislators from districts throughout Indiana and his clients have been successful in every recount or election contest he has defended before the Indiana Recount Commission. In 2007, Bill successfully defended a state legislator in a post-election challenge to his residency that was brought in Porter County Superior Court. In 2006, Bill obtained a trial court judgment overturning the Boone County Election Board’s refusal to accept a candidate’s filing for local office.

Bill is familiar with the intricate rules applicable to entities of state and local government and has regularly been hired by municipalities, legislative bodies, county election boards, state agencies and other elected officials to provide advice and handle litigation on their behalf. Cases of note in which Bill has been involved include his representation of the City of East Chicago in multiple lawsuits before the Indiana Supreme Court in 2009 and 2010 concerning the City’s entitlement to revenues under the economic development agreement with the East Chicago riverboat. Foundations of East Chicago, Inc. v. City of East Chicago, 927 N.E.2d 900, 2010 WL 1979159, (Ind. 2010); City of East Chicago, Indiana v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 908 N.E.2d 611 (Ind. 2009); and Zoeller v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc., 904 N.E.2d 213 (Ind.2009).

Bill has also successfully handled political firing cases and other employment disputes for municipalities. In Skrundz v. Pabey, 2009 WL 1704687 (N.D.Ind. 2009), Bill obtained a judgment on the evidence in his client’s favor following a four-day jury trial in a political firing case. Other political discharge cases in which Bill was involved are identified below in a listing of representative cases.

Bill received his J.D. degree, cum laude, from the University of Michigan Law School in 1989 and clerked for then U.S. District Judge, John Daniel Tinder, during 1990-1992.